Abstract
The design of policy tools reveals underlying biases that are not easily identified in policy documents. A review of two early childhood education and care subsidies in Ireland aimed at different target populations exposes differential treatment of children, parents and service providers. It also demonstrates how in a split system 'early education' is prioritised over 'childcare'. The designs serve to reinforce stereotypes that enable the powerful and advantaged to accrue benefits while those perceived to be less deserving are burdened through the maldistribution of resources.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 277-288 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal of Poverty and Social Justice |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Early childhood education and care
- Policy design
- Policy tool
- Rhetoric
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Who benefits from early childcare subsidy design in Ireland?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver