Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Traditional vs. machine-learning techniques for OSM quality assessment

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Nowadays an ever-increasing number of applications require complete and up-to-date spatial data, in particular maps. However, mapping is an expensive process and the vastness and dynamics of our world usually render centralized and authoritative maps outdated and incomplete. In this context crowd-sourced maps have the potential to provide a complete, up-to-date, and free representation of our world. However, the proliferation of such maps largely remains limited due to concerns about their data quality. While most of the current data quality assessment mechanisms for such maps require referencing to authoritative maps, we argue that such referencing of a crowd-sourced spatial database is ineffective. Instead we focus on the use of machine learning techniques that we believe have the potential to not only allow the assessment but also to recommend the improvement of the quality of crowd-sourced maps without referencing to external databases. This chapter gives an overview of these approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationVolunteered Geographic Information and the Future of Geospatial Data
PublisherIGI Global
Pages47-64
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781522524472
ISBN (Print)1522524460, 9781522524465
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Traditional vs. machine-learning techniques for OSM quality assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this