The economic and environmental combination between building materials and fuel source to improve building energy performance

Rakshit Doddegowdankoppal Muddu, Fohagui Fodoup Cyrille Vincelas, Tchuen Ghislain, Aimee Byrne, Tchitnga Robert, Anthony James Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the economic and environmental combination between building materials and fuel source to improve building energy performance by considering the entransy loss. The annual entransy losses through the residential building walls were determined using the degree-day’s method. Life cycle cost and life cycle assessment were used for the determination of the optimum insulation thickness, entransy saving, environmental impacts and emissions rate of CO2 and SO2. Results Shows that optimum thicknesses vary between 0.04 and 0.08 m, entransy savings shift between 4 and 25 $/m2, environmental impacts between4 and 65 mPts/m2 and emissions of CO2 and SO2 between 1300 and 35,000 g/m2, 5 and 60 g/m2, respectively, depending on the wall, fuel and insulation combinations. Light weight concrete block (LWCB) building insulated with polyisocyanurate using natural gas was found to be the best combination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)444-459
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Ambient Energy
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • Insulation thickness
  • degree-days method
  • energy performances
  • entransy
  • environmental impact

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The economic and environmental combination between building materials and fuel source to improve building energy performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this