Abstract
The paper aims to provide both a radical critique of the “smart city” as a techno-ideological apparatus,that through data analysis and algorithmic forms of governmentality tends to colonize space and time, and an attempt to reframe the very concept of intelligence within the smart cities. Two concepts are presented as tools for such a reframing: locality and idiom, where the first is conceived as openness of meaning generated by a territory, while the latter,analysed througha paradigmatic Irish example (Friel’s play Translations), prepares the ground for the pars construensof the paper. The claim, built by intertwining a set of authors (Ricoeur, Grice, Derrida, Stiegler), is that of passing from smartness and digital networksto the “real smart cities”,which aim should point tothe development of differential and collective intelligence (noodiversity).
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Article number | SSN: 1825-5167. |
| Pages (from-to) | 19-32 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Ethics and Politics |
| Volume | s, XXII, 2020, 2, pp. 19-32, ISSN: 1825-5167. |
| Issue number | XXII |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- History and philosophy of science and technology, Ethics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Data City, the Idiom and Questions of Locality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver