The creditor duty post Sequana: lessons for legislative reform

John Quinn, Philip Gavin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

UK common law recognises that directors owe a fiduciary duty to consider creditors' interests when a company is insolvent or in financial difficulty. However, the scope of this duty remains unclear, particularly the degree of financial difficulty necessary for it to arise. In 2022, in BTI v Sequana, the Supreme Court did little to resolve these uncertainties, retaining a context first approach, where the duty's triggering point is based on the facts and the risk borne by creditors in the specific case. In contrast, Ireland codified its creditor duty in 2022, setting out a series of legislatively defined financial situations where the duty applies and what the duty entails. This article argues that while a search for complete doctrinal certainty in this area is misguided, a degree of certainty over and above the position in Sequana can be achieved and that Ireland's codification offers valuable lessons for future UK reform.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-296
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Corporate Law Studies
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • BTI v Sequana
  • Creditor duty
  • directors’ duties

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The creditor duty post Sequana: lessons for legislative reform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this