TY - JOUR
T1 - Sources Fostering Academic Well-Being: Students' Perspectives In A PBL Context
AU - Chen, Juebei
AU - Bai, Shaoping
AU - Chaaban, Youman
AU - Du, Xiangyun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 SEFI 2023 - 51st Annual Conference of the European Society for Engineering Education: Engineering Education for Sustainability, Proceedings. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - In a post-pandemic learning era, student academic well-being emerges to the attention of educational researchers. Referring to students’ thoughts and behaviors that contribute to doing well in an educational context and their academic life satisfaction, student academic well-being has a significant influence on their recruitment and retention, learning experience, academic achievement, and competence development. However, while academic well-being has been regarded as an important indicator of student persistence in their current study and learning outcomes, limited studies have explored engineering students’ academic well-being and other supportive factors in engineering education. While several studies have examined how well-being is constituted and how it can be measured from medical, mental health, and eudaimonic philosophical perspectives, understanding engineering student academic well-being from social-cognitive and sociocultural aspects is also important. This is because wellbeing is not only influenced by personal feelings and perceptions, but also dynamically framed by interpersonal relations, as well as contextual and institutional conditions. To increase retention and help engineering students to become agentic professionals, it is desirable to help them to become proactive and purposeful learners in their studies. Thus, aimed at filling in this literature gap, this study will adopt the Q methodology to explore how engineering students perceive the sources contributing to their academic well-being in a Danish university. Suggestions will be proposed to optimize future curriculum design to support student academic well-being
AB - In a post-pandemic learning era, student academic well-being emerges to the attention of educational researchers. Referring to students’ thoughts and behaviors that contribute to doing well in an educational context and their academic life satisfaction, student academic well-being has a significant influence on their recruitment and retention, learning experience, academic achievement, and competence development. However, while academic well-being has been regarded as an important indicator of student persistence in their current study and learning outcomes, limited studies have explored engineering students’ academic well-being and other supportive factors in engineering education. While several studies have examined how well-being is constituted and how it can be measured from medical, mental health, and eudaimonic philosophical perspectives, understanding engineering student academic well-being from social-cognitive and sociocultural aspects is also important. This is because wellbeing is not only influenced by personal feelings and perceptions, but also dynamically framed by interpersonal relations, as well as contextual and institutional conditions. To increase retention and help engineering students to become agentic professionals, it is desirable to help them to become proactive and purposeful learners in their studies. Thus, aimed at filling in this literature gap, this study will adopt the Q methodology to explore how engineering students perceive the sources contributing to their academic well-being in a Danish university. Suggestions will be proposed to optimize future curriculum design to support student academic well-being
KW - student academic well-being
KW - engineering education
KW - retention
KW - learning experience
KW - academic achievement
KW - competence development
KW - social-cognitive aspects
KW - sociocultural aspects
KW - Q methodology
KW - curriculum design
KW - Engineering student
KW - Academic well-being
KW - PBL
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85179854237
U2 - 10.21427/pbzg-p397
DO - 10.21427/pbzg-p397
M3 - Article
SP - 256
EP - 264
JO - European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI)
JF - European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI)
ER -