Abstract
Theories of international trade have severe difficulties in explaining why, despite i) substantial differences in factor-proportions across industries and ii) considerable cross-country differences in capital-labor ratios, the iii) the evidence for factor proportions trade is rather weak. We propose a simple explanation of this well known finding: standard trade theories treat important forces such as the distribution of productivity within the economy as exogenous. We argue instead that the productivity allocation is endogenous and counter-balances factor-proportion differentials between countries. Consequently, comparative advantage across countries of different development levels is negligible and this is why the incentives for trade are low.
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Publisher | University College Dublin |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Publication series
| Name | UCD Centre for Economic Research, Working Paper Series |
|---|---|
| No. | WP2018_19 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- factor-proportions trade
- Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Solving Leontief's Paradox with Endogenous Growth Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver