Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Solving Leontief's Paradox with Endogenous Growth Theory

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

Theories of international trade have severe difficulties in explaining why, despite i) substantial differences in factor-proportions across industries and ii) considerable cross-country differences in capital-labor ratios, the iii) the evidence for factor proportions trade is rather weak. We propose a simple explanation of this well known finding: standard trade theories treat important forces such as the distribution of productivity within the economy as exogenous. We argue instead that the productivity allocation is endogenous and counter-balances factor-proportion differentials between countries. Consequently, comparative advantage across countries of different development levels is negligible and this is why the incentives for trade are low.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
PublisherUniversity College Dublin
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Publication series

NameUCD Centre for Economic Research, Working Paper Series
No.WP2018_19

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  3. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • factor-proportions trade
  • Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Solving Leontief's Paradox with Endogenous Growth Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this