Rankings: Does What Gets Counted Get Done?

E. Hazelkorn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Much of the debate around rankings has focused on methodological problems—which indicators and weightings, the credibility of the statistical process, and why (or why not) inconsistencies arise. There are also complaints about the overreliance on research rather than teaching. Yet, there has been little commentary about the increasing use of quantitative methodologies to drive decision making at the national or institutional level—what I call policymaking by numbers. The same issues arise about performance indicators, in general.Have rankings accelerated this trend? And, because indicators incentivizebehavior, are we measuring what counts or are we doing what gets measured—a classic case of “goal displacement”?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-5
JournalInternational higher education
Volume65
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011

Keywords

  • rankings
  • methodological problems
  • indicators
  • weightings
  • statistical process
  • research
  • teaching
  • quantitative methodologies
  • decision making
  • policymaking by numbers
  • performance indicators
  • goal displacement

Cite this