TY - JOUR
T1 - Preprocessing Strategies for Sparse Infrared Spectroscopy
T2 - A Case Study on Cartilage Diagnostics
AU - Tafintseva, Valeria
AU - Lintvedt, Tiril Aurora
AU - Solheim, Johanne Heitmann
AU - Zimmermann, Boris
AU - Rehman, Hafeez Ur
AU - Virtanen, Vesa
AU - Shaikh, Rubina
AU - Nippolainen, Ervin
AU - Afara, Isaac
AU - Saarakkala, Simo
AU - Rieppo, Lassi
AU - Krebs, Patrick
AU - Fomina, Polina
AU - Mizaikoff, Boris
AU - Kohler, Achim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2022/2/1
Y1 - 2022/2/1
N2 - The aim of the study was to optimize preprocessing of sparse infrared spectral data. The sparse data were obtained by reducing broadband Fourier transform infrared attenuated total re-flectance spectra of bovine and human cartilage, as well as of simulated spectral data, comprising several thousand spectral variables into datasets comprising only seven spectral variables. Different preprocessing approaches were compared, including simple baseline correction and normalization procedures, and model-based preprocessing, such as multiplicative signal correction (MSC). The optimal preprocessing was selected based on the quality of classification models established by partial least squares discriminant analysis for discriminating healthy and damaged cartilage samples. The best results for the sparse data were obtained by preprocessing using a baseline offset correction at 1800 cm−1, followed by peak normalization at 850cm−1 and preprocessing by MSC.
AB - The aim of the study was to optimize preprocessing of sparse infrared spectral data. The sparse data were obtained by reducing broadband Fourier transform infrared attenuated total re-flectance spectra of bovine and human cartilage, as well as of simulated spectral data, comprising several thousand spectral variables into datasets comprising only seven spectral variables. Different preprocessing approaches were compared, including simple baseline correction and normalization procedures, and model-based preprocessing, such as multiplicative signal correction (MSC). The optimal preprocessing was selected based on the quality of classification models established by partial least squares discriminant analysis for discriminating healthy and damaged cartilage samples. The best results for the sparse data were obtained by preprocessing using a baseline offset correction at 1800 cm−1, followed by peak normalization at 850cm−1 and preprocessing by MSC.
KW - Multiplicative signal correction
KW - Preprocessing
KW - Quantum cascade lasers
KW - Sparse spectra
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123519541&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/molecules27030873
DO - 10.3390/molecules27030873
M3 - Article
C2 - 35164133
AN - SCOPUS:85123519541
SN - 1420-3049
VL - 27
JO - Molecules
JF - Molecules
IS - 3
M1 - 873
ER -