Permuting input for more effective sampling of 3D conformer space

Giorgio Carta, Valeria Onnis, Andrew J.S. Knox, Darren Fayne, David G. Lloyd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

SMILES strings and other classic 2D structural formats offer a convenient way to represent molecules as a simplistic connection table, with the inherent advantages of ease of handling and storage. In the context of virtual screening, chemical databases to be screened are often initially represented by canonicalised SMILES strings that can be filtered and pre-processed in a number of ways, resulting in molecules that occupy similar regions of chemical space to active compounds of a therapeutic target. A wide variety of software exists to convert molecules into SMILES format, namely, Mol2smi (Daylight Inc.), MOE (Chemical Computing Group) and Babel (Openeye Scientific Software). Depending on the algorithm employed, the atoms of a SMILES string defining a molecule can be ordered differently. Upon conversion to 3D coordinates they result in the production of ostensibly the same molecule. In this work we show how different permutations of a SMILES string can affect conformer generation, affecting reliability and repeatability of the results. Furthermore, we propose a novel procedure for the generation of conformers, taking advantage of the permutation of the input strings-both SMILES and other 2D formats, leading to more effective sampling of conformation space in output, and also implementing fingerprint and principal component analyses step to post process and visualise the results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-190
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2006

Keywords

  • Conformers
  • Docking
  • Drug discovery
  • Fingerprints
  • Scoring
  • SMILES
  • Virtual screening

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Permuting input for more effective sampling of 3D conformer space'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this