On the relationship between sampling rate and Hidden Markov Models accuracy in non-intrusive load monitoring

Steven Lynch, Luca Longo

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

Providing domestic energy consumers with a detailed breakdown of their electricity consumption, at the appliance level, empowers the consumer to better manage that consumption and reduce their overall electricity demand. Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring (NILM) is one method of achieving this breakdown and makes use of one sensor which measures overall combined electricity usage. As all appliances are measured in combination in NILM this consumption must be disaggregated to extract appliance level consumption. Machine learning techniques can be adopted to perform this disaggregation with various levels of accuracy, with Hidden Markov Model (HMM) derivatives offering among the most accurate results. This work investigates how sensor sampling rate affects disaggregation accuracy obtained through HMM. Derived re-sampled data was passed through HMM and the resulting accuracy compared with the sampling rates. Correlation was observed and statistically verified. Two distinct groups of appliances were later identified, one which was highly correlated and another in which correlation was not observed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)180-192
Number of pages13
JournalCEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume2086
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Event25th Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, AICS 2017 - Dublin, Ireland
Duration: 7 Dec 20178 Dec 2017

Keywords

  • domestic energy consumers
  • electricity consumption
  • Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring
  • NILM
  • sensor
  • disaggregated
  • appliance level consumption
  • Machine learning
  • Hidden Markov Model
  • HMM
  • sensor sampling rate
  • disaggregation accuracy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the relationship between sampling rate and Hidden Markov Models accuracy in non-intrusive load monitoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this