Abstract
Theories of international trade have severe difficulties in explaining why, despite i) substantial differences in factor-proportions across industries and ii) considerable cross-country differences in capital-labor ratios, the iii) capital intensity of U.S imports does not vary systematically across countries. We propose a simple explanation: standard trade theories disconnect assumptions about the productivity from other core model parameters. In a standard macroeconomic model, we show that appropriately accounting for the factor-bias of productivity, in conjunction with endogenous capital formation, eradicates the gains from factor-proportions trade and can thus reconcile the three aforementioned stylized facts.
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Trinity College Dublin |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Publication series
| Name | Trinity Economics Papers |
|---|---|
| No. | 0817 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the Factor Content of Trade'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver