TY - JOUR
T1 - Language policy-making in ireland
T2 - A preliminary study of the consultation process of languages connect
AU - Nocchi, Susanna
AU - Erdocia, Iker
AU - Ruane, Mary
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Irish Association for Applied Linguistics. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/11/27
Y1 - 2020/11/27
N2 - This study aims to explore the policy-making process of Languages Connect-Ireland’s Strategy for Foreign Languages in Education 2017-2026. For that purpose, we concentrate on the consultation process adopted by the Department of Education and Skills. Drawing on a concept of foreign language competence as human capital, the aim of this study is twofold. Firstly, we investigate the extent to which the submissions to the consultation process form a sequence with the final document, Languages Connect; secondly, we examine the Irish government documents and compare the submissions reflecting the government approach to language with those problematising such discourse. The former analysis reveals how a market-led valuing of languages is embedded in the government discourse. The latter analysis further shows that linguistic diversity did not receive as much attention as language competence. Bearing in mind that participatory and deliberative procedures are meant to provide legitimacy for policy decisions, the paper concludes by discussing some of the positionings taken in Languages Connect and the role of the procedural mechanisms employed in the consultation.
AB - This study aims to explore the policy-making process of Languages Connect-Ireland’s Strategy for Foreign Languages in Education 2017-2026. For that purpose, we concentrate on the consultation process adopted by the Department of Education and Skills. Drawing on a concept of foreign language competence as human capital, the aim of this study is twofold. Firstly, we investigate the extent to which the submissions to the consultation process form a sequence with the final document, Languages Connect; secondly, we examine the Irish government documents and compare the submissions reflecting the government approach to language with those problematising such discourse. The former analysis reveals how a market-led valuing of languages is embedded in the government discourse. The latter analysis further shows that linguistic diversity did not receive as much attention as language competence. Bearing in mind that participatory and deliberative procedures are meant to provide legitimacy for policy decisions, the paper concludes by discussing some of the positionings taken in Languages Connect and the role of the procedural mechanisms employed in the consultation.
KW - Deliberation
KW - Language policy and planning
KW - Mixed methods research
KW - Participatory policy-making
KW - Policy analysis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85102764497
U2 - 10.35903/teanga.v27i.224
DO - 10.35903/teanga.v27i.224
M3 - Article
SN - 0332-205X
VL - 27
SP - 98
EP - 127
JO - Teanga
JF - Teanga
ER -