TY - GEN
T1 - Issues in organisation and management of multidisciplinary group design projects
AU - Keating, Ken
AU - Brougham, Claire
AU - Gavin, Graham
AU - Reilly, Ger
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - In education project teams that reflect organisational concepts considered normal in industrial design teams have a range of benefits for learning and graduate employability. They present a range of issues in terms of management of individual and group expectations. This paper focuses primarily on the issues of expectation and perceived performance as they manifest themselves through self-assessment. It interprets student perception and expectations of their individual and group performance, along with the experiences of their tutors in the management of a capstone group design project in the graduating year on the BSc in Medical Device Innovation at the Dublin Institute of Technology. In summary we found fewer issues in traditional problem areas such as student motivation, initiative, quality of individual work, and more issues related to interpersonal relationships, personal expectations in group-work, group dynamics, group management/decision making and the pacing of the group project against a characteristic time schedule. We also found students had a tendency to assess and score their individual contribution higher than their peers, and their tutors, and to collectively assess their collaborative outputs higher than the sum of their individual contributions. This paper makes the case for transparent assessment of the learning process, the design process and the design product.
AB - In education project teams that reflect organisational concepts considered normal in industrial design teams have a range of benefits for learning and graduate employability. They present a range of issues in terms of management of individual and group expectations. This paper focuses primarily on the issues of expectation and perceived performance as they manifest themselves through self-assessment. It interprets student perception and expectations of their individual and group performance, along with the experiences of their tutors in the management of a capstone group design project in the graduating year on the BSc in Medical Device Innovation at the Dublin Institute of Technology. In summary we found fewer issues in traditional problem areas such as student motivation, initiative, quality of individual work, and more issues related to interpersonal relationships, personal expectations in group-work, group dynamics, group management/decision making and the pacing of the group project against a characteristic time schedule. We also found students had a tendency to assess and score their individual contribution higher than their peers, and their tutors, and to collectively assess their collaborative outputs higher than the sum of their individual contributions. This paper makes the case for transparent assessment of the learning process, the design process and the design product.
KW - Biomedical device design
KW - Collaborative learning
KW - Multidisciplinary group projects
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891342602&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21427/swvg-wv12
DO - 10.21427/swvg-wv12
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84891342602
SN - 9781904670421
T3 - Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Design Education - Growing Our Future, EPDE 2013
SP - 302
EP - 307
BT - Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education
T2 - 15th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Design Education - Growing Our Future, EPDE 2013
Y2 - 5 September 2013 through 6 September 2013
ER -