Increased mitochondrial mass in cells with functionally compromised mitochondria after exposure to both direct γ radiation and bystander factors

Sharon M.E. Nugent, Carmel E. Mothersill, Colin Seymour, Brendan McClean, Fiona M. Lyng, James E.J. Murphy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    84 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The bystander effect describes radiation-like damage in unirradiated cells either in the vicinity of irradiated cells or exposed to medium from irradiated cells. This study aimed to further characterize the poorly understood mitochondrial response to both direct irradiation and bystander factor(s) in human keratinocytes (HPV-G) and Chinese hamster ovarian cells (CHO-K1). Oxygen consumption rates were determined during periods of state 4, state 3 and uncoupled respiration. Mitochondrial mass was determined using MitoTracker FM. CHO-K1 cells showed significantly reduced oxygen consumption rates 4 h after exposure to 5 Gy direct radiation and irradiated cell conditioned medium (ICCM) and an apparent recovery 12-24 h later. The apparent recovery was likely due to the substantial increase in mitochondrial mass observed in these cells as soon as 4 h after exposure. HPV-G cells, on the other hand, showed a sustained increase in oxygen consumption rates after ICCM exposure and a transient increase 4 h after exposure to 5 Gy direct radiation. A significant increase in mitochondrial mass per HPV-G cell was observed after exposure to both direct radiation and ICCM. These findings are indicative of a stress response to mitochondrial dysfunction that increases the number of mitochondria per cell.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)134-142
    Number of pages9
    JournalRadiation Research
    Volume168
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Increased mitochondrial mass in cells with functionally compromised mitochondria after exposure to both direct γ radiation and bystander factors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this