Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

IMI: The Role of Light in Refractive Development and Myopia: Evidence from Animal and Human Studies

  • Regan Ashby
  • , Elise N. Harb
  • , Lisa A. Ostrin
  • , Daniel Ian Flitcroft
  • , Frank Schaeffel
  • , Cindy Karouta
  • , Timothy Gawne
  • , Ranjay Chakraborty
  • , Kate Thomson
  • , Scott Read
  • , Rigmor C. Baraas
  • , Raymond P. Najjar
  • , Kathryn Rose
  • , John R. Phillips
  • , Pei Chang Wu
  • , Xiangui He
  • , Xiao Nicole Liu
  • , Weizhong Lan
  • , Barbara Swiatczak
  • , Hidemasa Torii
  • Audrey Chia, Ian Morgan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Spending time outdoors is consistently associated with delayed myopia onset in children and has been incorporated into prevention programs. While the underlying mechanisms remain under investigation, substantial evidence supports sunlight exposure as a key contributing factor. This review evaluates the evidence supporting this association. Animal studies demonstrate that light characteristics—such as intensity, chromaticity, and photoperiod—can influence refractive development, often postulated to function through modulation of the dopaminergic system. However, translating these findings to humans is challenging due to limited data. Evidence remains insufficient regarding how specific light properties—including intensity thresholds, exposure durations, spectral composition, and temporal patterns—affect human myopia. Consequently, although clinical recommendations for outdoor time (e.g., 2 hours daily) are well supported by epidemiological studies and widely endorsed, current literature does not yet support evidence-based guidelines concerning specific characteristics of light exposure. Addressing this gap requires further randomized controlled trials using standardized wearable technologies to better quantify children’s visual environments and identify light-related cues relevant to myopia development. Interest in light-based therapies is growing, but most interventions remain in early stages of development/testing. Due to limited efficacy data or unresolved safety concerns, no clinical recommendations can currently be made. Interpreting light-related research—especially from across animal models—requires caution. Species-specific differences in ocular transmittance and opsin distribution/tuning complicate the translation of chromatically related findings between species and to humans. Moreover, the term “white light” can be misleading, as artificial sources vary spectrally from each other and from sunlight, resulting in varied patterns of opsin activation. Studies should therefore attempt to report not only light intensity, but also the radiant power emitted at each wavelength to enable meaningful comparisons.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume66
Issue number15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • light
  • lux
  • myopia
  • outdoor activity
  • visual environment
  • wearable technologies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'IMI: The Role of Light in Refractive Development and Myopia: Evidence from Animal and Human Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this