Abstract
We examine whether hedging effectiveness is affected by asymmetry in the return distribution by applying tail-specific metrics, for example, value at risk, to compare the hedging effectiveness of short and long hedgers. Comparisons are applied to a number of hedging strategies including OLS and both symmetric and asymmetric generalised autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic models. We apply our analysis to a dataset consisting of S&P500 index cash and futures containing symmetric and asymmetric return distributions chosen ex post. Our findings show that asymmetry reduces out-of-sample hedging performance and that significant differences occur in hedging performance between short and long hedgers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 135-147 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | European Journal of Finance |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- asymmetry
- conditional value at risk
- hedging performance
- lower partial moments
- value at risk