TY - GEN
T1 - Educators' Evaluation of Explanation Types in XAI for Higher Education Dropout
AU - Maathuis, Henry
AU - Glazenborg, Jan
AU - Grol, Meike
AU - Quille, Keith
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
PY - 2026/2/16
Y1 - 2026/2/16
N2 - First-year student dropout rates represent a global challenge, particularly in Computer Science programs. In response, the Predict Student Success (PreSS) tool was developed over two decades using Naïve Bayes, a black box machine learning model, to identify students at risk of early withdrawal or academic failure. Given growing concerns about the use of black box models in high-stakes domains such as education, this study builds on former research by comparing the Naïve Bayes model to three glass box AI models: Decision Tree, Explainable Boosting Machine, and Automatic Piecewise Linear Regression. These models were used to generate four types of explainable AI visualisations: Feature Importance, Similar and Contrastive Examples, Decision Rules, and Counterfactuals. Educators evaluated these visualisations through a qualitative survey. Results indicate that glass box models can perform competitively with Naïve Bayes, and that contrastive explanation types were most preferred among educators. Open-ended responses underscore the importance of clear user guidance when implementing such tools.
AB - First-year student dropout rates represent a global challenge, particularly in Computer Science programs. In response, the Predict Student Success (PreSS) tool was developed over two decades using Naïve Bayes, a black box machine learning model, to identify students at risk of early withdrawal or academic failure. Given growing concerns about the use of black box models in high-stakes domains such as education, this study builds on former research by comparing the Naïve Bayes model to three glass box AI models: Decision Tree, Explainable Boosting Machine, and Automatic Piecewise Linear Regression. These models were used to generate four types of explainable AI visualisations: Feature Importance, Similar and Contrastive Examples, Decision Rules, and Counterfactuals. Educators evaluated these visualisations through a qualitative survey. Results indicate that glass box models can perform competitively with Naïve Bayes, and that contrastive explanation types were most preferred among educators. Open-ended responses underscore the importance of clear user guidance when implementing such tools.
KW - Higher Education Dropout
KW - Human-Centered Explainable AI
KW - Student Success Prediction
KW - User Perception
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105031772345
U2 - 10.1145/3777490.3777499
DO - 10.1145/3777490.3777499
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105031772345
T3 - HCAI-ep 2026 - Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Human Centered Artificial Intelligence - Education and Practice
SP - 61
EP - 67
BT - HCAI-ep 2026 - Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Human Centered Artificial Intelligence - Education and Practice
PB - Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
T2 - 3rd International Conference on Human-Centred AI - Education and Practice, HCAI-ep 2026
Y2 - 21 January 2026 through 22 January 2026
ER -