DNA damaging bystander signalling from stem cells, cancer cells and fibroblasts after Cr(VI) exposure and its dependence on telomerase

Nicola Cogan, Duncan M. Baird, Ryan Phillips, Lucy A. Crompton, Maeve A. Caldwell, Miguel A. Rubio, Roger Newson, Fiona Lyng, C. Patrick Case

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The bystander effect is a feature of low dose radiation exposure and is characterized by a signaling process from irradiated cells to non irradiated cells, which causes DNA and chromosome damage in these 'nearest neighbour' cells. Here we show that a low and short dose of Cr(VI) can induce stem cells, cancer cells and fibroblasts to chronically secrete bystander signals, which cause DNA damage in neighboring cells. The Cr(VI) induced bystander signaling depended on the telomerase status of either cell. Telomerase negative fibroblasts were able to receive DNA damaging signals from telomerase positive or negative fibroblasts or telomerase positive cancer cells. However telomerase positive fibroblasts were resistant to signals from Cr(VI) exposed telomerase positive fibroblasts or cancer cells. Human embryonic stem cells, with positive Oct4 staining as a marker of pluripotency, showed no significant increase of DNA damage from adjacent Cr and mitomycin C exposed fibroblasts whilst those cells that were negatively stained did. This selectivity of DNA damaging bystander signaling could be an important consideration in developing therapies against cancer and in the safety and effectiveness of tissue engineering and transplantation using stem cells.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalMutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis
Volume683
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jan 2010

Keywords

  • Cancer cell
  • Chromium
  • DNA damage
  • Stem cells
  • Telomerase
  • Telomere

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'DNA damaging bystander signalling from stem cells, cancer cells and fibroblasts after Cr(VI) exposure and its dependence on telomerase'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this