TY - JOUR
T1 - Digital forensic tools
T2 - Recent advances and enhancing the status quo
AU - Wu, Tina
AU - Breitinger, Frank
AU - O'Shaughnessy, Stephen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - Publications in the digital forensics domain frequently come with tools – a small piece of functional software. These tools are often released to the public for others to reproduce results or use them for their own purposes. However, there has been no study on the tools to understand better what is available and what is missing. For this paper we analyzed almost 800 articles from pertinent venues from 2014 to 2019 to answer the following three questions (1) what tools (i.e., in which domains of digital forensics): have been released; (2) are they still available, maintained, and documented; and (3) are there possibilities to enhance the status quo? We found 62 different tools which we categorized according to digital forensics subfields. Only 33 of these tools were found to be publicly available, the majority of these were not maintained after development. In order to enhance the status quo, one recommendation is a centralized repository specifically for tested tools. This will require tool researchers (developers) to spend more time on code documentation and preferably develop plugins instead of stand-alone tools.
AB - Publications in the digital forensics domain frequently come with tools – a small piece of functional software. These tools are often released to the public for others to reproduce results or use them for their own purposes. However, there has been no study on the tools to understand better what is available and what is missing. For this paper we analyzed almost 800 articles from pertinent venues from 2014 to 2019 to answer the following three questions (1) what tools (i.e., in which domains of digital forensics): have been released; (2) are they still available, maintained, and documented; and (3) are there possibilities to enhance the status quo? We found 62 different tools which we categorized according to digital forensics subfields. Only 33 of these tools were found to be publicly available, the majority of these were not maintained after development. In order to enhance the status quo, one recommendation is a centralized repository specifically for tested tools. This will require tool researchers (developers) to spend more time on code documentation and preferably develop plugins instead of stand-alone tools.
KW - Availability
KW - Digital forensic tools
KW - Literature review
KW - Open source software
KW - Published software
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098474314&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fsidi.2020.300999
DO - 10.1016/j.fsidi.2020.300999
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098474314
SN - 2666-2825
VL - 34
JO - Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation
JF - Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation
M1 - 300999
ER -