TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing a new health-related policy analysis tool
T2 - An action research cooperative inquiry approach
AU - Casey, Mary
AU - Rohde, Daniela
AU - Brady, Anne Marie
AU - Fealy, Gerard
AU - Hegarty, Josephine
AU - Kennedy, Catriona
AU - McNamara, Martin
AU - Nicholson, Emma
AU - O'Connell, Rhona
AU - O'Connor, Laserina
AU - O'Leary, Denise
AU - O'Reilly, Pauline
AU - Stokes, Diarmuid
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - Aim: To develop a tool for the analysis of nursing, midwifery and health-related policy and professional guidance documents. Background: Analysis tools can aid both policy evaluation and policy development. However, no framework for analysing the content of professional regulation and guidance documents among health care professionals currently exists. Method: This study used an action research, cooperative inquiry design. Data were generated from two integrative literature reviews and discussions held during the cooperative inquiry meetings. Results: A set of key themes to be considered in the development or evaluation of health policy or professional regulation and guidance documents were identified. These themes formed the basis of the six domains considered by the Health-related Policy Analysis Tool (HrPAT): Context, Process, Content, Stakeholder Consultation, Implementation and Evaluation. Conclusion: Use of the HrPAT can assist in policy development, evaluation and implementation, as well as providing some retrospective analytical insights into existing health policies. Implication for Nursing Management: Professional regulation documents, guidelines and policy reports should be capable of being scrutinized for their content, quality and developmental process. The HrPAT can assist relevant stakeholders in the development, analysis and evaluation of such documents, including local, service-level policies and guidelines.
AB - Aim: To develop a tool for the analysis of nursing, midwifery and health-related policy and professional guidance documents. Background: Analysis tools can aid both policy evaluation and policy development. However, no framework for analysing the content of professional regulation and guidance documents among health care professionals currently exists. Method: This study used an action research, cooperative inquiry design. Data were generated from two integrative literature reviews and discussions held during the cooperative inquiry meetings. Results: A set of key themes to be considered in the development or evaluation of health policy or professional regulation and guidance documents were identified. These themes formed the basis of the six domains considered by the Health-related Policy Analysis Tool (HrPAT): Context, Process, Content, Stakeholder Consultation, Implementation and Evaluation. Conclusion: Use of the HrPAT can assist in policy development, evaluation and implementation, as well as providing some retrospective analytical insights into existing health policies. Implication for Nursing Management: Professional regulation documents, guidelines and policy reports should be capable of being scrutinized for their content, quality and developmental process. The HrPAT can assist relevant stakeholders in the development, analysis and evaluation of such documents, including local, service-level policies and guidelines.
KW - health policy
KW - health services research
KW - nursing
KW - policymaking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068145817&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jonm.12804
DO - 10.1111/jonm.12804
M3 - Article
C2 - 31169959
AN - SCOPUS:85068145817
SN - 0966-0429
VL - 27
SP - 1233
EP - 1241
JO - Journal of Nursing Management
JF - Journal of Nursing Management
IS - 6
ER -