Abstract
Activity recognition has mainly focused to date on identifying repetitious and/or clearly delineated events. Our experience, drawing on many years’ research in smart and sensorised systems, leads us to observe that many (if not most) interesting activities fall into a different category: sporadically occurring and poorly differentiated from other concurrent activities. This implies that decision-making remains uncertain across the entire system, and suggests that progress would be greatly supported by standard evaluation methodologies and data sets.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
| Event | Pervasive 2010 - Helsinki, Finland Duration: 17 May 2010 → 21 May 2010 |
Conference
| Conference | Pervasive 2010 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Finland |
| City | Helsinki |
| Period | 17/05/10 → 21/05/10 |
| Other | How to do good activity recognition research? Experimental methodologies, evaluation metrics, and reproducibility issues |
Keywords
- Activity recognition
- repetitious events
- delineated events
- smart systems
- sensorised systems
- sporadic activities
- concurrent activities
- decision-making
- evaluation methodologies
- data sets