Abstract
Differences in growth rates across countries imply a strong relation between factor proportions based trade and key aggregate economic outcomes. We construct two macro-trade datasets and illustrate that this relation is rather weak in the data. We propose a simple explanation: in the presence of intra- industry trade, pronounced trade specialization patterns culminate in a loss of varieties. In a dynamic two-country model, we illustrate that the introduction of intra-industry trade overwhelmingly subdues the inter-industry trade dynamics and realigns the behavior of standard models with the empirical evidence along various dimensions. We also provide empirical support for our mechanism: labor and capital intensive goods are traded between developed and developing countries in both directions and in similar proportions in overall trade.
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Trinity College Dublin |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Publication series
| Name | Trinity Economics Papers |
|---|---|
| No. | 1116 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- Heckscher-Ohlin
- Armington trade
- factor proportion based trade
- comparative advantage
- two-country general equilibrium model
- Feldstein-Horioka
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Competing Gains From Trade'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver