Comparative study on efficiency of surface enhanced coal fly ash and raw coal fly ash for the removal of hazardous dyes in wastewater: optimization through response surface methodology

  • Haris Nadeem
  • , Faisal Jamil
  • , Muhammad Adnan Iqbal
  • , Tan Wen Nee
  • , Muhammad Kashif
  • , Ahmad Hamdy Ibrahim
  • , Sawsan S. Al-Rawi
  • , Sami Ullah Zia
  • , Umar Sohail Shoukat
  • , Rimsha Kanwal
  • , Farhan Ahmad
  • , Sabha Khalid
  • , Muhammad Tjammal Rehman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Crystal violet (CV) dye, because of its non-biodegradability and harmful effects, poses a significant challenge for wastewater treatment. This study addresses the efficiency of easily accessible coal fly ash (CFA)-based adsorbents such as raw coal fly ash (RCFA) and surface enhanced coal fly ash (SECFA), in removing CV dye from waste effluents. Various analytical techniques such as FTIR, XRD, SEM, TEM, BET, zeta sizer and zeta potential were employed for the characterization of the adsorbents and dye-loaded samples. BET revealed that RCFA possesses a surface area of 19.370 m2 g−1 and SECFA of 27.391 m2 g−1, exhibiting pore volumes of 0.1365 cm3 g−1 and 0.1919 cm3 g−1 respectively. Zeta-sizer and potential analysis showed the static charges of RCFA as −27.3 mV and SECFA as −28.2 mV, with average particle sizes of 346.6 and 315.3 nm, respectively. Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherms were also employed for adsorption studies. Employing central composite design (CCD) of response surface methodology (RSM), the maximum CV removal was 81.52% for RCFA and 97.52% for SECFA, providing one minute contact time, 0.0125 g adsorbent dose and 10 ppm dye concentration. From the thermodynamic studies, all the negative values of ΔG° showed that all the adsorption processes of both adsorbents were spontaneous in nature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22312-22325
Number of pages14
JournalRSC Advances
Volume14
Issue number31
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2024
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative study on efficiency of surface enhanced coal fly ash and raw coal fly ash for the removal of hazardous dyes in wastewater: optimization through response surface methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this