TY - GEN
T1 - Comparative study between direct load control and fuzzy logic control based demand response
AU - Chandran, Chittesh Veni
AU - Basu, Malabika
AU - Sunderland, Keith
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016/7/2
Y1 - 2016/7/2
N2 - Demand response (DR), as part of Demand side management (DSM), is a method that modifies consumer side energy consumption. By actively controlling the time associated with electricity consumption, both energy and economic efficiencies are increased. There is however, depending on the algorithm employed, potential for consumer comfort levels to be adversely affected. Generally direct load (Boolean logic) control is employed, which solely considers demand reduction and not customer comfort. In comparison, fuzzy logic based programs can consider non-deterministic inputs such as consumer comfort level with ease and simplicity. This paper considers the evolution of DR through a comparison of the classical (direct load method) and modern (fuzzy method) methods, with particular attention on the advantages provided by the latter. The impact on consumer comfort in fuzzy DR implementation is further explored through the effect of temperature deviation. In this regard, the consequences for fuzzy DR are considered in respect to three temperature profiles. Finally, temporal availability and the consequences for DR are considered in the context of a household.
AB - Demand response (DR), as part of Demand side management (DSM), is a method that modifies consumer side energy consumption. By actively controlling the time associated with electricity consumption, both energy and economic efficiencies are increased. There is however, depending on the algorithm employed, potential for consumer comfort levels to be adversely affected. Generally direct load (Boolean logic) control is employed, which solely considers demand reduction and not customer comfort. In comparison, fuzzy logic based programs can consider non-deterministic inputs such as consumer comfort level with ease and simplicity. This paper considers the evolution of DR through a comparison of the classical (direct load method) and modern (fuzzy method) methods, with particular attention on the advantages provided by the latter. The impact on consumer comfort in fuzzy DR implementation is further explored through the effect of temperature deviation. In this regard, the consequences for fuzzy DR are considered in respect to three temperature profiles. Finally, temporal availability and the consequences for DR are considered in the context of a household.
KW - Demand response
KW - demand side management Direct Load control (DLC)
KW - Energy management
KW - Energy savings
KW - Fuzzy control
KW - Fuzzy systems
KW - Fuzzy technology
KW - Load management
KW - Power demand
KW - Rational decision-making model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047749345&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/UPEC.2016.8114090
DO - 10.1109/UPEC.2016.8114090
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85047749345
T3 - Proceedings - 2016 51st International Universities Power Engineering Conference, UPEC 2016
SP - 1
EP - 6
BT - Proceedings - 2016 51st International Universities Power Engineering Conference, UPEC 2016
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 51st International Universities Power Engineering Conference, UPEC 2016
Y2 - 6 September 2016 through 9 September 2016
ER -