Busy Boards, Cash Holdings and Corporate Liquidity: Evidence from UK Panel Data

Valentina Tarkovska

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Abstract

This study examines the effect of board busyness on corporate cash holdings. We offer new insights by evaluating two conflicting views regarding the quality of service that busy directors provide to corporate boards and their impact on decision making. One view is that directors who simultaneously serve on multiple boards improve board decision making ability as they have better experience and bu siness connections (reputational effect).The opposite view is that directors with multiple seats are “too busy to mind the business”, which creates serious agency problems and leads into suboptimal corporate decisions(busyness effect). We analyse a large sample of UK listed companies over the 1997 to 2009 period and document evidence supporting a non-linear relationship between our proxy for board busyness and corporate cash holdings. In line with the reputational effect, we find that companies with board members that hold seats in other companies maintain a higher level of cash, net cash and financial slack. This effect is present, however, only at low levels of board busyness. In line with the busyness effect, our findings suggest that as board busy ness increases beyond a certain threshold, it negatively affects cash holdings, net cash and financial slack .
Original languageEnglish
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2013
EventEuropean Financial Management association annual conference - Reading, United Kingdom
Duration: 1 Jan 2013 → …

Conference

ConferenceEuropean Financial Management association annual conference
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityReading
Period1/01/13 → …

Keywords

  • board busyness
  • corporate cash holdings
  • decision making
  • agency problems
  • UK listed companies
  • reputational effect
  • busyness effect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Busy Boards, Cash Holdings and Corporate Liquidity: Evidence from UK Panel Data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this