An international comparison of K-12 computer science education intended and enacted curricula

Katrina Falkner, Sue Sentance, Rebecca Vivian, Sarah Barksdale, Leonard Busuttil, Elizabeth Cole, Christine Liebe, Francesco Maiorana, Monica M. McGill, Keith Quille

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

This paper presents an international study of K-12 Computer Science implementation across Australia, England, Ireland, Italy, Malta, Scotland and the United States. We present findings from a pilot study, comparing CS curriculum requirements (intended curriculum) captured through country reports, with what surveyed teachers (n=244) identify as enacting in their classroom (the enacted curriculum). We address the extent that teachers are implementing the intended curriculum as enacted curriculum, exploring specifically country differences in terms of programming languages and CS topics implemented. Our findings highlight the similarities and differences of intended and enacted CS curriculum within and across countries and the value of such comparisons.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - 19th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling 2019
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)
ISBN (Electronic)9781450377157
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Nov 2019
Event19th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling 2019 - Koli, Finland
Duration: 21 Nov 201924 Nov 2019

Publication series

NameACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Conference

Conference19th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling 2019
Country/TerritoryFinland
CityKoli
Period21/11/1924/11/19

Keywords

  • Curriculum
  • Enacted Curriculum
  • Intended Curriculum
  • K-12 Computer Science Education
  • Programming
  • Schools
  • Teachers
  • Topics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An international comparison of K-12 computer science education intended and enacted curricula'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this