An empirical study of option prices for hunting permits

To N. Nguyen, W. Douglass Shaw, Richard T. Woodward, Robert Paterson, Kevin Boyle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Using data from a 1992 survey of Maine hunters, we estimate the willingness to pay for a program that would eliminate the risk of non-participation in an otherwise lottery-rationed moose hunting system. We develop an empirical model to estimate the option price (OP) hunters have for eliminating this risk, based on survey data. We find an estimated OP to eliminate the non-participation risk associated with the lottery system of over $380. The estimated results are compared with the results of 12 years of management experience. We also provide a modest ex-post analysis and overview of an auction of a small number of licenses occurring since 1998. Based on the estimates from the model and survey data, we believe that moose management strategies in recent years would pass a benefit-cost test.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)476-484
Number of pages9
JournalEcological Economics
Volume63
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Lottery-rationed hunting
  • Option price
  • Referendum contingent valuation
  • RUM

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An empirical study of option prices for hunting permits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this