TY - GEN
T1 - AI for Emergency Department Predictions
AU - Ayinavilli, Surya Teja Gowd
AU - Badal, Dipesh
AU - Staunton, John
AU - Ohiwerei, Olohigbe
AU - Jaiswal, Rajesh
AU - Quille, Keith
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
PY - 2026/2/16
Y1 - 2026/2/16
N2 - Emergency departments face constant pressure from overcrowding, making early prediction of patient admission a valuable support for clinicians. In this study, we used the MIMIC-IV-ED v2.2 dataset, containing about 296,000 visits and 38 triage-level features, to develop and compare multiple machine learning models for admission prediction. Across five approaches - Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, and a Deep Neural Network - performance ranged from moderate to strong, achieving AUROC values up to 0.84 and balanced accuracy around 77%. Despite these results, recall for admitted patients remained around 60%, indicating that many potential admissions were not detected. Explainable AI methods (SHAP and LIME) identified triage acuity, patient age, arrival transport, and medication counts as key drivers of model decisions. Fairness analysis revealed demographic disparities, with younger patients predicted more accurately than older adults, and elderly women particularly disadvantaged. Compression experiments further showed that quantisation and pruning reduced model size and latency with minimal performance loss. The study highlights the potential of predictive triage systems while underscoring the importance of fairness monitoring, calibration, and regulatory compliance before deployment.
AB - Emergency departments face constant pressure from overcrowding, making early prediction of patient admission a valuable support for clinicians. In this study, we used the MIMIC-IV-ED v2.2 dataset, containing about 296,000 visits and 38 triage-level features, to develop and compare multiple machine learning models for admission prediction. Across five approaches - Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, and a Deep Neural Network - performance ranged from moderate to strong, achieving AUROC values up to 0.84 and balanced accuracy around 77%. Despite these results, recall for admitted patients remained around 60%, indicating that many potential admissions were not detected. Explainable AI methods (SHAP and LIME) identified triage acuity, patient age, arrival transport, and medication counts as key drivers of model decisions. Fairness analysis revealed demographic disparities, with younger patients predicted more accurately than older adults, and elderly women particularly disadvantaged. Compression experiments further showed that quantisation and pruning reduced model size and latency with minimal performance loss. The study highlights the potential of predictive triage systems while underscoring the importance of fairness monitoring, calibration, and regulatory compliance before deployment.
KW - Admission Prediction
KW - ED
KW - EU AI Act
KW - XAI Fairness
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105031782424
U2 - 10.1145/3777490.3777512
DO - 10.1145/3777490.3777512
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105031782424
T3 - HCAI-ep 2026 - Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Human Centered Artificial Intelligence - Education and Practice
SP - 119
BT - HCAI-ep 2026 - Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Human Centered Artificial Intelligence - Education and Practice
PB - Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
T2 - 3rd International Conference on Human-Centred AI - Education and Practice, HCAI-ep 2026
Y2 - 21 January 2026 through 22 January 2026
ER -