A Teaching Practice Review of the Use of Multiple-Choice Questions for Formative and Summative Assessment of Student Work on Advanced Undergraduate and Postgraduate Modules in Engineering

Aidan O'Dwyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper reflects on, reports on and evaluates the use of multiple-choice questions, in both formative and summative assessment modes, on control engineering modules taken by advanced undergraduate and postgraduate engineering students, over four academic years. The material covered by the modules is analytical in nature. The rationale for examining the assessment strategy was the poor performance by students in a closed book traditional terminal examination on one of the advanced undergraduate modules over some years. The change in assessment strategy has improved student learning, as measured by assessment data; student feedback on the assessment methods is broadly positive. The assessment approach has been extended with success to some postgraduate modules. Overall, an evidence based approach is taken in the reporting and analysis.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAll-Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Keywords

  • multiple-choice questions
  • formative assessment
  • summative assessment
  • control engineering
  • undergraduate
  • postgraduate
  • student learning
  • assessment strategy
  • student feedback
  • evidence based approach

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Teaching Practice Review of the Use of Multiple-Choice Questions for Formative and Summative Assessment of Student Work on Advanced Undergraduate and Postgraduate Modules in Engineering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this