TY - GEN
T1 - A simulation analysis of photovoltaic AC Module Integrated Converters in parallel, under controlled edge shading conditions
AU - O'Callaghan, Lynette
AU - McKeever, Michael
AU - Norton, Brian
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - A DC and AC power simulation comparison of: a Photovoltaic (PV) array with a modular, parallel, AC converter configuration; and a series, string configuration with a central AC converter, is presented. The systems are simulated using a comprehensive range of edge shading scenarios and irradiance conditions. Power control and transformation circuitry must be designed for shade and module mismatch tolerance to prevent over-proportional power to shade losses, as average losses from Building Integrated PV (BIPV) systems are approximately 20 to 25%, due to shade, mismatch, differences in orientation and inclination, and temperature effects. 59.4% of the simulations showed gains in AC power by using the parallel modular converter system, with a maximum gain of 10.74%, when compared with the series configuration. Losses up to 6.61% can be experienced when most of the modules are experiencing edge shading of 200 or 400W/m 2, as i) the converter efficiency is lower in this power range for the modular converter, and ii) this low efficiency conversion occurs n times, where n is the number of modules in the array. Significant power increases are experienced by the parallel modular system when there is a wide distribution of irradiance levels within the shading pattern.
AB - A DC and AC power simulation comparison of: a Photovoltaic (PV) array with a modular, parallel, AC converter configuration; and a series, string configuration with a central AC converter, is presented. The systems are simulated using a comprehensive range of edge shading scenarios and irradiance conditions. Power control and transformation circuitry must be designed for shade and module mismatch tolerance to prevent over-proportional power to shade losses, as average losses from Building Integrated PV (BIPV) systems are approximately 20 to 25%, due to shade, mismatch, differences in orientation and inclination, and temperature effects. 59.4% of the simulations showed gains in AC power by using the parallel modular converter system, with a maximum gain of 10.74%, when compared with the series configuration. Losses up to 6.61% can be experienced when most of the modules are experiencing edge shading of 200 or 400W/m 2, as i) the converter efficiency is lower in this power range for the modular converter, and ii) this low efficiency conversion occurs n times, where n is the number of modules in the array. Significant power increases are experienced by the parallel modular system when there is a wide distribution of irradiance levels within the shading pattern.
KW - AC
KW - AC MIC
KW - BIPV
KW - configuration
KW - Converter
KW - gains
KW - Inverter
KW - losses
KW - MIC
KW - microinverter
KW - model
KW - Photovoltaic
KW - simulation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84864197266
U2 - 10.1109/EEEIC.2012.6221467
DO - 10.1109/EEEIC.2012.6221467
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84864197266
SN - 9781457718281
T3 - 2012 11th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering, EEEIC 2012 - Conference Proceedings
SP - 699
EP - 705
BT - 2012 11th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering, EEEIC 2012 - Conference Proceedings
T2 - 2012 11th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering, EEEIC 2012
Y2 - 18 May 2012 through 25 May 2012
ER -