A Comparison of three commercially available Contrast-Detail phantoms and evaluation of the effect of Instrument Settings on the performance

Des Hickey; Ashling Mcnabb; Jacinta Browne

doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.05.008

A Comparison of three commercially available Contrast-Detail phantoms and evaluation of the effect of Instrument Settings on the performance

Des Hickey
, Ashling Mcnabb
, Jacinta Browne

School of Physics, Clinical and Optometric Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	568
Journal	Physica Medica
Volume	29
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.05.008
Publication status	Published - 1 Sep 2013

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.05.008

Cite this

@article{61e9d15ac1b84d4b9711355393ef8e1e,

title = "A Comparison of three commercially available Contrast-Detail phantoms and evaluation of the effect of Instrument Settings on the performance",

author = "Des Hickey and Ashling Mcnabb and Jacinta Browne",

year = "2013",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.05.008",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "568",

journal = "Physica Medica",

issn = "1120-1797",

publisher = "Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of three commercially available Contrast-Detail phantoms and evaluation of the effect of Instrument Settings on the performance

AU - Hickey, Des

AU - Mcnabb, Ashling

AU - Browne, Jacinta

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.05.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.05.008

M3 - Article

SN - 1120-1797

VL - 29

SP - 568

JO - Physica Medica

JF - Physica Medica

IS - 5

ER -