A Comparison of Evidence Fusion Rules for Situation Recognition in Sensor-Based Environments

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Dempster-Shafer (DS) theory, and its associated Dempster rule of combination, has been widely used to determine belief based on uncertain evidence sources. Variations to the original Dempster rule of combination have appeared in the literature to support particular scenarios where unreliable results may result from the use of original DS theory. While theoretical explanations of the rule variations are explained, there is a lack of empirical comparisons of the DS theory and its variations against real data sets. In this work, we examine several variations to DS theory. Using two real-world sensor data sets, we compare the performance of DS theory and several of its variations in recognising situations. The empirical results shed insight on how to select these fusion rules based on the nature of sensor data, the relationship of this data over time to the higher level hypotheses and the choice of frame of discernment.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEvolving Ambient Intelligence - AmI 2013 Workshops, Revised Selected Papers
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages163-175
Number of pages13
ISBN (Print)9783319044057
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Event4th International Joint Conference on Ambient Intelligence, AmI 2013 - Dublin, Ireland
Duration: 3 Dec 20135 Dec 2013

Publication series

NameCommunications in Computer and Information Science
Volume413 CCIS
ISSN (Print)1865-0929

Conference

Conference4th International Joint Conference on Ambient Intelligence, AmI 2013
Country/TerritoryIreland
CityDublin
Period3/12/135/12/13

Keywords

  • Dempster Shafer theory
  • Evidence theory
  • situation recognition
  • situations
  • uncertain reasoning
  • uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of Evidence Fusion Rules for Situation Recognition in Sensor-Based Environments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this